AC Milan 1 -3 Juventus: Match Report
Andrea Pirlo and Stefano Pioli came head-to-head for the first time in a match that could potentially decide the fate of the title race. In a game that finally ended Milan’s 15 game unbeaten run, Juventus ran rampant and dismantled Pioli’s side.
Juventus Structure
Juventus would attack in 3-5-2 while defending in a 4-4-2, Frabrotta’s movement from LB -> LWB would allow Juventus to overload the left, and with Chiesa hugging the touchline up until he got into the final third which allowed him the freedom to roam into dangerous goalscoring areas
Milan Structure
Milan would defence in a either a 4-4-2, 4-4-1-1, or even 4-5-1 depending on the movement of Calhanoglu, in attack Hernandez would overlap on the left allowing Hauge to drift inside, Castillejo would hold the width on the right as Dalot was not given the same freedom as Hernandez to venture into the final third. Instead, Dalot would play more like an auxiliary third midfielder creating a staggered 2-3-5 shape for Milan.
Juventus First Phase
Juventus started the game set up with a 2-3 structure in the build-up with the back 5 consisting of Bonucci, De Ligt, Danilo, Bentancur and Frabotta. Milan counteracted this with using somewhat of a man to man marking system with Leao shifting from marking the RCB to GK depending on the position of the ball. As a result, the Juventus defence was forced to play the long ball into midfield multiple times.
However, smart movement from the Juventus midfielders such as Ramsey in this screenshot was able to exploit one of the main flaws of man for man marking, individual errors
However, relying on individual mistakes or individual brilliance is not sustainable and in the first half Juventus was consistently turning the ball over in their own third until they started to use clever rotations to find passing options in space.
Juventus Second Phase
As Juventus would shift from the 4-4-2 to the 3-5-2, the back three (Danilo, Bonucci, De Ligt) and the DM (Bentancur) were able to recycle possession comfortably as they had central superiority. With Frabotta and Chiesa hugging the touchline, Juventus were able to stretch the pitch as much as possible
So, when Chiesa receives the ball out on the right, he can either take on Theo Hernandez in a 1v1 situation or hold the ball up and wait for Dybala and Rabiot to show for the ball to combine with them and fashion an opening in the final third.
The 3-5-2 allowed the 8’s (Rabiot and Ramsey) to pull wide and offer themselves as passing options to the wide CB’s (Danilo and De Ligt), this allowed the midfielders to receive the ball beyond the first line of pressure and away from Milan’s DM’s (Kessie and Calabria)
Juventus Final Third
The 3-5-2 allowed Juventus to occupy at least 4 if not 5 of the channels consistently, Milan would struggle to cope as defending in a 4-4-2 meant they could only cover 4 of those channels and as a result, they were susceptible to leaving a free man on either touchline.
The front 5 would consist of Frabotta, Ronaldo, Dybala, Chiesa and one of Ramsey or Rabiot. Juventus would utilise 1-2’s for the WB to come inside or take on the opposing FB to fashion an opportunity for a cross at the by-line
At times Danilo would venture forward from CB to receive in the space vacated by Chiesa, this would give him the option to cross under minimal pressure or play Chiesa in behind for a cutback
Milan First Phase
Milan would set up with their two CB’s (Kjaer and Romagnoli) splitting wide and one of their DM’s (usually Kessie) to invite the Juventus press, and then decide to play long to try and challenge for the second ball.
Since the middle of the pitch is now vacated, Milan can exploit the space by challenging for the second ball and quickly transitioning into a counter.
Milan Second Phase
Milan relies on the movement of Calhanoglu to progress the ball, he will travel across the pitch to offer himself as a passing option and allow Milan to create wide overloads in the second phase
Although Calhanoglu was more biased to the left, he was still able to come short towards the right to create overloads to progress the ball.
Milan Final Third
However, Calhanoglu’s drifting wide constantly is what hurt Milan most in the final third. Juventus’ 4-4-2 defensive shape meant that the wide areas were comfortably covered. Furthermore, the lack of a central presence in and around the area lead to a minimised threat to create big chances.
Dalot’s movement was also important, while he was less adventurous than Hernandez in breaking into the final third, he offered himself as a passing option by moving into the midfield three. Dalot moving inside would occasionally attract the attention of Ramsey at LM, leaving Castillejo in a potential 1v1 with Frabotta. However, Milan were too slow in switching the play in the following sequence allowed Juventus to adjust and defend Castillejo with Ramsey and Frabotta.
However, with Leao’s pace and ball carrying, they remained a threat on the counter due to him being a great outlet.
Regardless, the lack of a player connecting play in the central areas of the final third meant that Milan did not do much to disrupt Juventus’ shape when they were settled in the 4-4-2 and it is evident with the Pioli’s side only accumulating an xG of 0.91 (according to Infogol).
Conclusion
Stefano Pioli has earned a lot of praise for Milan’s scintillating start to the season, however, Juventus swept them aside to gain a valuable three points which see them close the gap to 7 points being Milan with a game in hand. This Juventus side is well-coached and Andrea Pirlo deserves time and patience to revamp this squad because he has the potential to be a world-class coach.
Written by RMD who you can find on Twitter with @/Raudemeter_EN